Contact us

Hands-on penetration testing, infrastructure audits and cloud security reviews. Every finding proven, rated and written up so your engineers can fix it.

F-01 · Broken access controlHigh 8.1
[authz] GET /api/v1/invoices/7731 as customer_b → 200 OK owner: customer_a[fix] check ownership server-side
F-02 · SQL injectionCritical 9.8
[inject] GET /search?q='||pg_sleep(5)-- → response in 5.02 s no login required[fix] parameterised queries
F-03 · Public S3 bucketHigh 7.5
[cloud] s3://acme-backups public-read db-2026-09-01.sql.gz listable without credentials[fix] block public access
F-04 · Open database portMedium 5.3
[infra] 5432/tcp open to 0.0.0.0/0 postgres 13 (end of life) TLS disabled[fix] restrict to app subnet

Methodology aligned to

  • OWASP WSTG
  • OWASP MASTG
  • PTES
  • NIST SP 800-115
  • CIS Benchmarks
  • CVSS v3.1

Most breaches don't need a zero-day. They use a forgotten admin panel, an API that trusts the wrong user, a storage bucket left open. We look for those gaps the way an attacker would.

Key risks we uncover.

Exploitable application flaws

Scanners miss broken access control and logic flaws, so customer data can sit one changed ID away from the wrong user.

VAPT

Unhardened infrastructure

Open management ports, stale SSH keys and unpatched servers are the easy way in, and they pile up quietly as systems grow.

Infrastructure security audit

Cloud misconfiguration

A public bucket, an over-privileged role or a forgotten access key can expose everything without a single line of vulnerable code.

Cloud security review

Security without an owner

Questionnaires, audit requests and incidents land on whoever is free, and nobody tracks the risks in between.

Virtual CISO

Software nobody maintains

Sites and apps launched and left behind: outdated dependencies, expired certificates and admin panels nobody remembers.

Web development

Recent results (anonymised).

Security testing · Multi-tenant B2B SaaS, six apps and a shared API

Clean at the edge, the risk all in the API.The server trusted the client to behave.

Read the case study
findings
25
rated high
6
apps and API tested
7
API operations mapped
904
Security testing · HR and talent SaaS, two platforms

19 critical flaws across two SaaS platforms.The common thread: authorisation.

Read the case study
findings
160+
rated critical
19
end-to-end tests to prove them
535
of access logs analysed
30 days
Cloud review · Consumer wellness platform on Azure Kubernetes

41% off the monthly cloud bill.Without changing the app.

Read the case study
monthly cloud bill
−41%
saved a year
$21k
a month no longer billed twice
65 TB
database ports open to anyone
3 → 0

All case studies

What the report contains.

  1. Executive summary

    Overall risk in plain language, for leadership and for your customers.

  2. Severity you can check

    A CVSS v3.1 score and vector for every finding, adjusted for your context.

  3. Proof for every finding

    Steps to reproduce and request/response evidence.

  4. A specific fix

    What to change and where, written for the engineer who will change it.

  5. Retest status

    We verify each fix and reissue the report.

Araval · TechnologiesConfidential

Sample report · illustrative

Security assessment report

Example Corp · Web application & API · Grey-box

Findings by severity
  • Critical1
  • High3
  • Medium4
  • Low5
  • Info2
F-01High · 8.1

Broken object-level authorisation on the invoice API

Impact
Any customer can read and edit other customers' invoices
Fix
Check ownership on the server for every read and write
Status
Fixed · verified on retest

Have a release, audit or client questionnaire coming up? Tell us what needs testing.

  • Written authorisation before any test
  • Critical issues reported the same day
  • A written scope and fixed quote before work starts